JALDI

Jaldi-Vidhi

State of West Bengal v. Paschim Banga BK Samity

Case details and hearing information from the Constitution Bench Pendency Portal.

610

Message
show

State of West Bengal v. Paschim Banga BK Samity

This case deals with the constitutional validity of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955

Petitioners Arguments
Only a part of Article 14 has been held to be part of the basic structure of the constitution and therefore Article 300A need not conform to all facets of Article 14 (relying on T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State Of Karnataka [(2002) 8 SCC 481] ) . Unlike Article 31(2), Article 300A does not contemplate compensation for depriving a person of his property and therefore a citizen does not have the right to claim compensation or question the inadequacy of the same. The doctrine of eminent domain did not apply to a country with a written constitution. An Act will get protection under Article 31A if its dominant purpose is agrarian reform, even if it includes within its ambit, non-agricultural lands. Agrarian reform is wider than land reform and the Act envisioned the creation of a new social order and an increase in employment opportunities, which were different facets of agrarian reform ( Sasanka Sekhar Maiti v. Union of India (1980) 4 SCC 716 ) A large and liberal meaning was to be given to expressions like ‘estate’ and ‘rights in an estate’. Acquisition of private property gets protection under Article 31C as private property comes within the definition of ‘material resources of the community’ and the redistribution thereof to provide access to equal opportunities and subserve common good gives effect to Article 39(b) ( Sanjeev Coke Mfg. Co. v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (1983) 1 SCC 147 ).
Responders Arguments
The judgment in Jillubhai Nanbhai Khachar v. State of Gujarat [1995 Supp. (1) SCC 596] , which was pronounced post the enactment of Article 300A states that acquisition of property by the state and payment of compensation were part of the scheme (of eminent domain) and they could not be dissected. Article 14 applies to land acquired under Article 300A insofar as compensation paid for acquisition of unequal types of land (farms, factories, buildings) cannot be equal and a blanket rate/area cannot be charged on all lands. Article 31C provides immunity against challenges on grounds of Article 14 and 19 but not against challenges on the grounds of violation of Article 300A. An Act will not be saved by Article 31A if it does not advance the object of Article 31A, i.e Agrarian Reform. By extension, the law is not saved by Article 31A insofar as the provisions which legislate on non-agricultural tenancies, factories, etc, and corresponding definitions of ‘land’ that include non-agricultural tenancies, factories, etc. The 1981 and 1986 Amending Acts (and the Constitutional amendments inserting them into the Ninth schedule) are violative of the basic structure of the Constitution and are therefore not protected under Article 31B.
Last Listed On
2024-09-11
Card Stage Date
2014-07-17
Review Petition No
C.A. No.16879/1996
Case Status
Pending
Bench Status
To be reconstituted
Subject Matter
Constitution
Pendency
11 years, 11 months, 13 days

5 Judge Bench

Awaiting bench reconstitution

Consider As Stage Of Pendency
true

Date of institution of case

Date of reference to 5 Judge Bench

In 1955, The West Bengal Land Reforms Act was enacted by the State to consolidate laws relating to land reforms. However, it did not have the desired impact due to various exemptions such as the ceiling limit on the land that could be held by a person applied only to agricultural lands, which led to large-scale conversions of agricultural land into non-agricultural land like orchards. The West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act 1981 (and the subsequent (Amendment) Act 1986) enacted several changes to plug these loopholes including removing the distinction between agricultural and non-agricultural lands. Several writ petitions were filed in the High Court questioning the constitutionality of the Act. The State argued that the Act was protected under i) Article 31A as the law provided for ‘acquisition of land rights’ in furtherance of the object of Article 31A (agrarian reform) ii) Article 31B as the principal Act and the amending Acts were included in the Ninth Schedule) and iii) Article 39(b) and (c) . A Division Bench of the High Court, while ruling that the Act was protected under Article 31A, 31B, 31C in its judgment held that the aforementioned Sections 2(7), 3A, and 14V of the West Bengal Act were ultra vires of Article 300A . On appeal, both the two-judge and the three-judge bench of the Supreme Court felt that the matter involved substantial issues of constitutional interpretation with respect to the scope of Article 300A and its interplay with Article 31A, 31B, and 31C among other things, and therefore referred the case to a Constitution Bench.

What is the scope and content of Article 300A? In particular, whether a law contemplated therein has to conform to Article 14 and/or any facet of Article 14 of the Constitution? What is the extent of protection available in respect of law which is challenged under Article 300A in the context of Articles 31A, 31B and 31C of the Constitution? Is the protection of Article 31A available when the scope of agrarian reform law is altered by amendment of the meaning of expressions "estate", "rights", "proprietor", sub-proprietor", "tenure holder", "raiyat and under raiyat" and "other intermediaries" (contrary to their meaning in 31A(2) of the Constitution) thereby covering non-agricultural lands including factories and mills? Does Article 300A allow for payment of any amount as compensation for depriving a person of his property under the authority of law? If yes, then what are the parameters of adjudging the principles for payment of the amount or the amount fixed by the Acquiring Act as illusory? Are the Constitutional Amendments inserting the amending Acts in the IXth Schedule violative of the Basic Structure of the Constitution and would therefore be open to challenge in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu [(2007) 2 SCC 1] and therefore liable to be struck down? Is Section 4-D inserted by the 1981 Amendment Act of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, which prescribes the offences and penalties with retrospective effect from 07-08-1969, in the face of the prohibition contained in Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India, valid?

West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955

The West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act 1981

The Supreme Court felt that there were substantial questions of law that required interpretation of the Constitution in the present case, and referred the matter to the Constitution Bench.

NA

State of W.B. v. Paschim Banga Rajya Bhumijibi Sangha

Date Of Institution Start
1997-01-20
Case No
C.A. No. 334/1997

State of W.B v. Umananda Roy(D) by LRS.

Date Of Institution Start
1997-01-20
Case No
C.A. No. 335/1997

Paschim Banga Rajya Bhumijibi Sangha v. State of W.B

Date Of Institution Start
1997-01-20
Case No
SLP(C) No. 1416/1997

State of W.B v. Tapas Kundu

Date Of Institution Start
1997-01-27
Case No
C.A. No. 509/1997

State of W.B v. Paschim Banga B.K. Samity

Date Of Institution Start
1997-01-27
Case No
C.A. No. 510/1997

Revenue Officer v. SK Abdul Hai

Date Of Institution Start
1997-02-10
Case No
C.A. No. 775/1997

The State of W.B And Others v. Tarapada Das Palit(Dead) by LRS.

Date Of Institution Start
1997-02-10
Case No
C.A. No. 776/1997

The State of W.B v. Md. Ahad Box

Date Of Institution Start
1997-03-03
Case No
C.A. No. 1789/1997

The State of W.B and Ors. v. Panchanan Roy and Ors.

Date Of Institution Start
1997-03-03
Case No
C.A. No. 1790/1997

The State of W.B and Ors. v. Krishna Gayen

Date Of Institution Start
1997-03-21
Case No
C.A. No. 2453/1997

The State of W.B v. Sri Ananta Purusottam Jew Thankur

Date Of Institution Start
1997-03-21
Case No
C.A. No. 2450/1997

State of W.B v. Harisadhan Bandopadhyay

Date Of Institution Start
1998-03-20
Case No
C.A. No. 1719/1998

Depeasantization Discontinued: Land Reforms in West Bengal

Depeasantization Discontinued: Land Reforms in West Bengal
Source Of Info
JSTOR

Determinants of Redistributive Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Land Reforms in West

Determinants of Redistributive Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Land Reforms in West
Source Of Info
EML Berkeley
Date Of Fr
2008-09-15

Belling the Cat: The Curious Case of the Ninth Schedule

Belling the Cat: The Curious Case of the Ninth Schedule
Source Of Info
JSTOR